Books for Prep | |
by: John G. Geer List Price: $21.00 Amazon.com's Price: $18.90 You Save: $2.10 (10%)Prices subject to change. Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
Binding: PaperbackDewey Decimal Number: 324.730973 EAN: 9780226284996 ISBN: 0226284999 Label: University Of Chicago Press Manufacturer: University Of Chicago Press Number Of Items: 1 Number Of Pages: 218 Publication Date: April 01, 2006 Publisher: University Of Chicago Press Studio: University Of Chicago Press Related Items:
Browse for similar items by category: Click to Display Editorial Review: Product Description: Americans tend to see negative campaign ads as just that: negative. Pundits, journalists, voters, and scholars frequently complain that such ads undermine elections and even democratic government itself. But John G. Geer here takes the opposite stance, arguing that when political candidates attack each other, raising doubts about each other’s views and qualifications, voters—and the democratic process—benefit. In Defense of Negativity, Geer’s study of negative advertising in presidential campaigns from 1960 to 2004, asserts that the proliferating attack ads are far more likely than positive ads to focus on salient political issues, rather than politicians’ personal characteristics. Accordingly, the ads enrich the democratic process, providing voters with relevant and substantial information before they head to the polls. An important and timely contribution to American political discourse, In Defense of Negativity concludes that if we want campaigns to grapple with relevant issues and address real problems, negative ads just might be the solution. Average Rating:
![]() Rating: - Turns Conventional Wisdom Regarding Negative Ads on its headThis is a wonderful book which directly challenges conventional wisdom regarding negative ads. Geer convincingly argues negative advertising is good for democracy. He notes negative ads are more likely to address important issue differences between candidates and provide supporting evidence. Positive ads are mostly fluff, do not address issues, and do not provide any supporting evidence regarding the candidates claims. He ultimately compares negative ads to eating spinach. We don't like it, but it ... Read More Rating: - A must read for anyone interested in elections!!!!This book is a very interesting read. Geer writes very well and has done very thorough research to back his assertions. This book looks at why attack ads can be helpful because they push your opponent to speak to the issue he is being attacked on. Very relevant with the Primaries winding down and the 2008 general election coming up soon. In association with Amazon.com | |