Books for Prep










 : Direct democracy: good or bad?: An article from: Campaigns & Elections
Amazon.com's Price: $5.95
Prices subject to change.



Availability: Available for download now



Binding: Digital
Format: HTML
Label: Campaigns & Elections, Inc.
Manufacturer: Campaigns & Elections, Inc.
Number Of Pages: 6
Publication Date: August 01, 1995
Publisher: Campaigns & Elections, Inc.
Release Date: July 28, 2005
Studio: Campaigns & Elections, Inc.




Browse for similar items by category: Click to Display



Editorial Review:

Product Description:
This digital document is an article from Campaigns & Elections, published by Campaigns & Elections, Inc. on August 1, 1995. The length of the article is 1754 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: Critics of direct democracy claim that direct democracy contradicts the principles of representative government, sacrifices public interest to narrow-interest groups and is biased towards positions that are supported by heavy political advertising. In contrast, advocates of direct democracy believe that it has had many good effects, such as the adoption of the 17th and 19th amendments. Moreover, they believe that direct democracy could work in the US because Americans tend to vote against radical, uncertain or unclear initiatives.

Citation Details
Title: Direct democracy: good or bad?
Author: Alan Secrest
Publication: Campaigns & Elections (Refereed)
Date: August 1, 1995
Publisher: Campaigns & Elections, Inc.
Volume: v16 Issue: n8 Page: p47(2)

Distributed by Thomson Gale











 






In association with Amazon.com